RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Bad Doctrine’ Category

The Deconstruction of Christianity In America: We Are On The Eve of A Christless Christianity

19 Oct

wrecking-ball3We are seeing a deconstruction of Christianity in America.  By deconstruction I mean the redefining of, and re-characterization of what it means to be Christian, all of which is leading our society headlong into an era of Christless Christianity.

We see an all-out assault on Christianity from the written media in the form of books such as “Jesus Interrupted” by Bart D Ehrman (who could be considered a modern-day “George Eliot” – aka Mary Ann Evans) who once having been an evangelical Christian himself, now tries to tell us that we can still be a “Christian” without believing that Jesus is the Son of God or believing that the Bible is the Word of God.

Next, we have recently seen efforts to deconstruct Christianity in the form of posting a huge highway billboard suggesting that Christians are “Jerks.”  The alarming thing is that the billboard was put up by a Christian church no less!  The truth be known, most often when you hear a Christian say that they are tired of the way Christians view the world, and make the suggestion that somehow Christianity needs to be redefined, such a Christian will invariably be walking down the path of compromising the truth.  Such a Christian is quite simply, in the words of the Apostle Paul, “ashamed of the gospel of Christ.”

Next, we see various groups within the Christian church who, instead of placing emphasis on sound biblical doctrine,  are placing an inordinate emphasis on empiricism in the forms of countless  (practically daily) angelic visitations by angels which are leaving behind “feathers”,  manifestations of brilliant and large “gemstones” that, if real, would be worth millions and millions of dollars, and let’s not overlook what I consider the most serious theological issue of all and that is the frequent trips to heaven during which certain Christians are claiming to have private audiences with the likes of Abraham, King David, the Apostle Paul and other biblical characters.  The Christians who are claiming to have such trips/meetings are even saying that these patriarchs are divulging personal information about how they wish they had communicated their messages in differing forms and texts than what we have in the Bible.

What makes these “trip to Heaven encounters” with the Saints of Old, so very serious is that, if true, then the Christian experiencing such meetings would be “bringing back” revelation and information that would supersede the authority of the Bible, if not outright relegate the Bible to meaninglessness.  This attack on the Word of God is wreaking havoc in the church and leading many astray as it essentially opens the door for all and various sorts of demonic doctrine.  To put it in street vernacular, if someone is going to say that they had lunch with the Apostle Paul, and during the course of this luncheon, Paul tells this person that he wishes he had said “this instead of that” and then that Christian comes “back to Earth”, who then can question anything they might say, as that Christian has had a personal and exclusive audience with Paul. Thus, that person’s experience becomes of greater importance than, and more authoritative than the Bible.  Nothing but trouble will come out of these false and made up stories. What we are witnessing is a form of Christianity that makes little if no mention whatsoever of the redemptive work of Jesus on the Cross.

Unfortunately, we are now seeing ministries that are being built, from the ground up, on these self-aggrandizing, self-focused, fantastic and Christless stories. Thus, having been started on such falsehood, it takes more and greater fantasy to keep such a ministry going.  It is really no telling what craziness we are about to witness in the name of Christianity.

Next, we see an attempt at redefining Christianity in the political realm.  It is becoming increasingly clear, with each election cycle, that any politician who claims to be a Bible believing Christian will now be ridiculed and mocked by the so-called objective media.  We have recently witnessed during the political debate between the two senatorial candidates running for the U.S. Senate seat in the State of Delaware, how the Christian candidate is made to look like a “buffoon” for saying that she believes evolution is a myth.  The media is in a “frenzy” to portray this candidate as literally a “moron” simply for her Christian beliefs, nothing else.  Also, in the political debate, we have candidates who are claiming the label of Christianity but, their values are not Christian.  This leads me to my next point.

We are witnessing in our society what I will call a Christless Christianity, that is, we are seeing and hearing certain individuals who are claiming to be Christians and who are espousing Christian values but, at the same time, these same individuals are denying Jesus.  All of this is heading down a perilous path that will ultimately lead to an amoral society.

You cannot deny Jesus as the Christ without denying His values.  To deny Jesus is to deny Christianity.  To deny Jesus is to deny the written record of the words Jesus spoke.  To deny Jesus is to deny God.  Thus, our society has reached a point of societal schizophrenia in the sense that we see many claiming the values of Christianity but, at the same time denying the Christ of Christianity.  This is leaving us with a Christless Christianity.  We can already see this being played out during the Christmas season.  We are encouraged to “get excited” about Christmas, spend lots of money on gifts but, just don’t mention the Christ of Christmas.  What we have ended up with is a Christless Christmas.

We would do well to take a look at history, as history is repeating itself big time.  Take for example the words of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900) as found in his work titled “Twilight of Idols” as he says “When one gives up the Christian faith, one pulls the right to Christian morality out from under one’s feet.  This morality is by no means self-evident: this point has to be exhibited again and again, despite the English flatheads.  Christianity is a system, a whole view of things thought out together.  By breaking one main concept out of it, the faith in God, one breaks the whole: nothing necessary remains in one’s hands.  Christianity presupposes that man does not know, cannot know, what is good for him, what evil: he believes in God, who alone knows it.  Christian morality is a command; its origin is transcendent, it is beyond all criticism, all right to criticism; it has truth only if God is the truth – it stands and falls with faith in God.”

From the above quote, we can see that if our society is going to deny Jesus, then our society cannot hold onto nor lay claim to the values of Christ.  For to deny Jesus is to deny God, and, once God is denied, then morality is subject to wholesale redefinition without any moral frame of reference.  This scenario is being played out before our very eyes and it is all going to end up badly.  In his book titled “Twilight of Atheism”, we see the words of Alister McGrath (p149) as he says “To remove God is to eliminate the final restraint on human brutality.”  McGrath makes this statement during a discussion of the early promoters of a godless society such as Fyodor M Dostoyevsky as they were wrestling with the danger of what could happen in a society without God.  And, indeed, history has shown what has happened to the societies that have eliminated any concept of morality from their fiber. To say that one does not believe in God is to automatically open the door for a redefinition of morality, more so, it opens the door for an existence without any concept of right or wrong.

 

I JUST FINISHED READING “THE LAW OF THE ANGELS” By GWEN SHAW

09 Jan

The Law of the Angels

This is a book which exhibits an incongruence between the title and what the book actually talks about.  The title “The Law of The Angels” sounds rather mystical and interesting but, once you get into the book, there is very little written about angels.  The one reference I find to the title is on page 41 where, as the author is speaking about the different expressions of love, she injects the statement “This is angel law. This is the way the angels live.”  After this brief reference to angels, there is not much more on the subject of angels.  I have seen in certain blogs that some are saying that this book was re-titled upon reprinting and given the title “Love: The Law of The Angels.”  However, the 1979 edition I was able to obtain is simply titled “The Law of The Angels.”

It appears that the thesis of this book is to give the reader a broad overview of the subject of love and how love is to operate in the lives of Christians.  Then, upon giving a protracted and tedious definition of what love is supposed to be in the life of the Christian, the more subtle and actual core emphasis of the book comes out. 

Gwen Shaw in her book The Law of The Angels portrays love as a more feminine attribute than masculine and thus Shaw puts forth the thesis that the Christian women of the world are spiritually superior to the Christian men of the world. And, because women are more spiritually sensitive than men, then by function women can be used by God to express His love to the world more than can be accomplished through “insensitive men.”

I realized that I needed to activate my theological radar defense shield (discernment of spirits) when on page VII of the Introduction we see Shaw say “I wish I could say that my own love is perfect, or that I myself had attained unto the high degree of perfection which you will find in the pages of this book.  These are truths that God has made known to me.” This type of posturing is something that I have become quite wary of lately.  As you will see shortly, Shaw’s statements were born out of false humility.

Before we get into the “love” part of the book, I do want to point out what I believe is another area of problematic theology in Shaw’s book.  It has to do with why Jesus was crucified and what was accomplished in the crucifixion.  On page 14 we see Shaw state “You see, the Law of Moses will never point anyone to the cross.  You know what the Law of Moses did?  It crucified Jesus.  Do you know that it was on the authority of the Law of Moses that the Jews crucified Jesus?”  One might ask why I see this as problematic.  It is troublesome because traditional and orthodox theology teaches us that the Law of Moses had the function of making mankind aware of his sin.  Then, we see that Jesus came to fulfill the requirements of the Law of Moses by offering Himself upon the Cross as a sacrifice for our sin.  And, it was Roman Soldiers who actually crucified Jesus by the insistence of the Jewish Scribes and Pharisees. I see this theological awkwardness as a product of Shaw’s hurried attempt to get straight to her main thesis of her book which appears to be the desire of God to express His love toward mankind, rather than judgment.

One other area to make note of before we get to the main thesis is that of the belief of the eternal existence of man’s spirit or what is known as the “pre-existence and transmigration of souls.” We see this on page 68 where Shaw states “Way back there in antiquity, in the origin of time, far beyond your known history or ability to recall, you were in the plan of God.  You are an eternal living spirit.  Your body is loaned to you for only a season of sojourn on Earth.  As an eternal being, you are without beginning or ending.  And back there, hidden in the midst of a million forgotten eons of time we stood in His glory, being part of His spirit, fashioned even then in His likeness, as He planned for us.  There He created us male and female.”

The above theology is extremely troublesome.  So, according to Shaw, “we always existed”, “we are part of God”, but yet God created us.  So, is God creating “part of Himself” or, what is going on here?

As troublesome as the already mentioned items are, the real “bombshell” of The Law of The Angels happens on page 111.  After having “put men in their place” on pages 72 and 73, we read on page 111 what Shaw is really trying to get the reader to believe.  On page 111, Shaw has been describing a vision she had of Eve praying and asking God to forgive her for her sin of disobedience in the Garden of Eden.  Eve is described as being very distraught and in much aguish before God.  Then, we see Shaw state “I saw how through the centuries, even after her transition (whatever that means), she had wept and cried to God the Father to be merciful to her sons and daughters.  She had interceded for our release and had been permitted to see that her prayers had not been in vain, her intercession had accomplished its goal and she had prayed through.  God is going to begin to show His glory to Eve’s children.  We have finished drinking the cup of our iniquity, our day of redemption is here now.  That is the reason God is using us handmaidens.  Somehow God is going to allow us to make up for our mother’s failure.  We not only want to bless and help our brothers return to the lost paradise, we want to return ourselves.  Oh, God help us!  Brothers, help us!  We need you and you need us!  We went out together and we must return together!…As women travail and intercede, they will be used by the Lord to restore all that has been lost through the fall.” 

So, there you have it.  God is going to use women to restore mankind to Himself.  But, what about the accomplished work of Jesus on the Cross?  Is it not complete?  Didn’t Jesus, through His sufferings and crucifixion restore all?  What was left undone?  What can woman do that has not been accomplished through and by the crucifixion?  If you think these questions are unfounded then, go on to page 115 and see Shaw state “I believe the Blood of Jesus is going to become more powerful in the end time.  More powerful than in the day it poured from His veins…”

If all of this is not a problem for you then, I must direct your attention to the most theologically explosive part of the entire book.  On pages 165 and 166 we see Shaw state “This feminine aspect of the eternal God is the El-Shaddai, the mother-nature of God.  It is in the realm that the Shekinah is revealed and does its high office work.  You will remember us mentioning in chapter 13 that God had created Adam male and female.  If God created man male and female, it was because bisexuality somehow belongs to His own nature.  The fact has been recognized by early rabbinic commentators that this is true.  One even concluded that God had made Adam androgynous, and later separated him into Adam and Eve.  Lantero states that it is recognized that while individuals belong to one sex or the other, we are all androgynous in the sense of having both male and female hormones, as well as potential character traits traditionally associated with both sexes.  This beautiful aspect of the mother nature of God is one which we need to meditate upon more. Why is it that the Glory of God,  His Shekinah, seems to be resting in greater magnitude on the daughters of Eve in this generation? This is very evident, not only in one country but in all the nations where I have worked for God, and especially where women have been permitted by their male elders to let God’s glory be borne witness of through their freedom to speak.  The women are the great intercessors, the fasters, the praisers, prophetesses, missionaries, healers, and they are fast becoming the deepest of teachers.” 

Finally, in reference to the above excerpt, on page 67, we see Shaw describe that when God first created Adam, that he was created with a womb, which God subsequently took out of Adam and used it to create Eve. 

The theology presented in Shaw’s book is simply shocking.  Gwen Shaw, in no uncertain terms, portrays Adam as having been created as an androgynous hermaphrodite.  She even says so in her book.  This depiction simply leaves one speechless.

Such theology by Gwen Shaw opens the door wide open for Satan to flood in with a horde of demonic spirits.  Shaw has theologically emasculated Christian men.  Shaw sets Christian women on a higher plane of greater power and importance than Christian men.  This is a Satanic doctrine.

This book is available through Amazon.com.

 

 

DOMINION ESCHATOLOGY

01 Nov
sunrise

Are Christians destined to take over the world before Jesus returns?  Is there a requirement found in the scripture that Christians must take over the world before Jesus can return?  Or, has Jesus already returned and now, in a corporate sense He manifests Himself in the lives of all believers in the Earth and all Christians are now commissioned to take over the Earth?  Will there be a rapture?

The above questions are being asked within the rank and file of the Body of Christ and you may be very surprised to learn some of the answers to these questions.  Some of the sacred and age old theological beliefs of the church are now being redefined by some in the Body of Christ.  For more than a couple of decades now, we have witnessed an emphasis within certain camps of the Body of Christ on what has evolved to now be known as “Dominion Eschatology”.

Now some of you may be asking at this point “what is he talking about?”  If you are that person, then you need to read this post most of all.  Let’s begin by looking at an article found in the October 2009 edition of Charisma Magazine.  On page 20 you will see an article entitled “Last Days Fever” and as part of this debate there is an inset of two views of the rapture found on pages 22 and 23.  Pay attention to page 23 and C Peter Wagner’s article entitled “The Case For Dominion”.  In this article we see Wagner state “I now regard my former pre-tribulationism and pre-millennialism as escapist eschatology”.  Next, he says “My favorite term is dominion eschatology.  Why? Because Jesus did not give His great commission in vain”.  And finally, Wagner states “We are aggressively retaking dominion, and the rate at which this is happening will soon become exponential”. 

So, what is Wagner talking about?  C Peter Wagner and his ministry is a vanguard for what is known as the Dominion Movement.  This movement and its theology has gone by several names over the last couple of decades.  If you have heard the terms “Kingdom Now”, “Kingdom Dominion” or “7-Mountain Doctrine” they are all one in the same.  You will note that by his own statements, on the issue of the rapture, Wagner does not hold to the orthodox position of the church.

To put it in street, what the Dominionsts are saying is that Christians are supposed to be about the business of taking over the world, and once this has been accomplished, then Jesus can return, and note the emphasis on “can”.  Still not convinced that this theology is all that developed?  I invite you to take a look at the posting titled “Dominionism and the Rise of Christian Imperialism” by Sarah Leslie.  This article can be found at http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/sarah-leslie/dominionism.htm.  In this article, you will see a quite comprehensive description of the development of the Dominion Movement and the theology associated with this movement.  I don’t quite agree with all  that you will find on this particular website but, this overview of Dominionism is too thorough to ignore. And, it proves rather quickly that Dominionism is not a secret.  

Still not convinced?  Perhaps you are thinking, this group is on the “fringe” of Christianity, plus the writer quotes some dubious sources.  OK, fair enough.  Let me ask you then, have you heard of President Clinton?  Of course you have.  Well, he had a high-ranking advisor named Sidney Blumenthal.  Mr Blumenthal has a son named Max Blumenthal.  And, Max Blumenthal has written a book titled “Republican Gomorrah”.  This book has become a media sensation and has been critiqued extensively in the national media. Simply go to You Tube and type in “Republican Gomorrah” and see for yourself. 

In his book, Blumenthal pulls no punches in his all out attack on the Republican Party for what he describes as the hypocrisy of the many Republican leaders who have fallen into various sex scandals.  To be “fair and balanced”, some of Blumenthal’s criticism is justified.  In saying that, mind you, I am certainly not overlooking all of the Democrat sex scandals.  But, that is not the focus of my article.  What I want to point you to is that also in his book, Blumenthal has the dual thesis of chronicling what he perceives as a rising movement within Christianity to vicariously “take over the world” through the Republican Party. 

In his book, Blumenthal comes as close as any secular writer or reporter I have seen, to “connecting all the dots”.  Let’s talk plainly here.  If you are a Jew, a Muslim or an atheist and you hear certain Christian leaders talk of “taking control of the governments of the world” then, don’t you think you are going to get their attention?  I can assure you, they are listening. One thesis in Blumenthal’s book is that he believes there is an underlying design, on the part of the Christian Right, to take control of the government.  I see two theses in Blumenthal’s book.  He himself indicates as much in an interview on “Morning Joe” which can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqeqRf9czAY or, type in “Morning Joe – Max Blumenthal – Has The GOP Been Driven Outside The Mainstream”. 

What I am saying to all my Christian brethren out there is that the secular media has connected the dots of Dominion Eschatology.  If you are an adherent to this particular theology, and you think all of this strategy to “take over the world” is a “well kept secret” then, think again.  You cannot ignore the reality I am laying out in this post.  I was just listening to a news program the other day and a leading liberal news commentator stated that Max Blumenthal’s book is quickly becoming a primary source of information for those wanting to know about the strategy of the “Radical Christian Right” and its designs on influencing government.  I am telling Christian leaders out there, if you ignore such a thing as this, then you are shirking your responsibility to be “in the know” about developments concerning the Body of Christ.

You can go to Amazon.com and type in “Republican Gomorrah” and then go to the book review link and see for yourself the “firestorm” of debate going on between liberals and conservatives over this book. I can tell you, if the Dominionists continue to push this doctrine and move ahead with their attempts to implement these goals, things are going to get very ugly, very quickly.

Did Jesus say He needed Christians to be in control of all systems of society in order for Him to return?  I don’t read anywhere in the Bible where Jesus says that.  Let’s look at Luke 4:6 where, after showing Jesus all the kingdoms of the world, Satan tempts Jesus when he says “All this authority I will give You, and their glory; for this has been delivered to me, and I give it to whomever I wish”.  It is serious theological error to assume by this verse that Satan is actually in control of the Kingdoms of this World.  This was a falsehood spoken by Satan and Jesus knew it.  How do we know this?  Look at Daniel 2:20-21 “Daniel answered and said: Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, For wisdom and might are His. And He changes the times and the seasons; He removes kings and raises up kings; He gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding. He reveals deep and secret things; He knows what is in the darkness,  And light dwells with Him”.   Next, look at Daniel 4:17 “This decision is by the decree of the watchers, And the sentence by the word of the holy ones, In order that the living may know That the Most High rules in the kingdom of men, Gives to whomever He will, And sets over it the lowest of men”. 

So, after reading the above scriptures, it is clear that God is in control of the systems and governments of the world.  Understanding this, could it be possible that Satan today, is using the same trickery and temptation with certain religious leaders to get them to think that the kingdoms of the world are “up for grabs” and thus he is using the thought of being in control of these governments as a temptation once again.

Let me talk plainly.  I see that the Dominionists have gotten way off base theologically.  They are more worried about taking over the world rather than “winning the world for Christ”.  They are more worried about being an “Apostle” rather than preaching the Gospel of Christ.  These certain leaders have fallen for the very temptation that Satan tried to tempt Jesus with in the wilderness.  These certain leaders are being tempted with power, wealth, glamour, prestige and control.  It is very dangerous and it is bringing undue and intense criticism against the Body of Christ. 

Pastors and Christian leaders had better “get up to speed” on this.  This theology has made substantial inroads into the Body of Christ. Dominionism was even “in play” in the recent Presidential election.  And, I might add, it is one of the reasons the Republicans lost.

As Christians, we must remember the words of Jesus as found in John 18:36 “My kingdom is not of this world.  If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight…”